Our People

J. Scott Tiedemann

Managing Partner, Los Angeles

Scott Tiedemann joined Liebert Cassidy Whitmore in 2000 and became the Managing Partner on October 1, 2010.  As Managing Partner, Scott is responsible for directing the successful operation of LCW on behalf of his partners.

Scott represents a wide variety of government agencies and schools in labor and employment matters.  He is a skilled litigator in federal and state courts and a successful appellate attorney.  Scott also expertly handles disciplinary appeal hearings, investigates workplace misconduct and conducts labor negotiations.

Scott is a very popular trainer.  He frequently speaks at national and statewide conferences on subjects such as disciplinary investigations, workplace harassment, employment discrimination, free speech, privacy and ethics.

Scott is particularly well-known for his expert representation of, and training provided to police and fire agencies across California on subjects including the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights and the Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights.  Scott authored the CPER Pocket Guide to the Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights and Chapter 8 (The Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights Act) of the California Public Sector Employment Law book, State Bar of California/LexisNexis (2011).  He was twice named a Rising Star in labor and employment law in Law & Politics Magazine.

He has prevailed in multiple published appellate cases that have helped public safety employers more effectively manage their employees.  His published decisions on behalf of public safety employers include, among others:  Upland Police Officers Association v. City of Upland (2003) 111 Cal.App.4th 1294, Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007) 149 Cal.4th 836 and Thompson v. City of Monrovia (2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 860, and Ferguson v. City of Cathedral City (2011) __Cal.Rptr.3d____ 2011 WL 2582134.

Scott sits on the Board of Advisors of the California Public Employee Relations (CPER) program.

When he is not managing the firm and practicing law, Scott loves to spend time with his wife and daughters, coach his daughters' soccer teams, and futilely root for the Dodgers. 

Representative Matters

Appellate

  • Ferguson v. City of Cathedral City (2011) - The Court of Appeal upheld termination of a police officer for solicitation of prostitution after the officer declared an earlier settlement agreement with the City "null and void" under which he had been suspended without pay.  The Court of Appeal also held that the City did not violate the officer's Skelly rights when the officer, who claimed to be unable to be able to drive the City for a Skelly meeting, was terminated without a Skelly meeting after he did not avail himself of various accommodations offered to him by the City to enable him to exercise his Skelly rights.
  • Thompson v. City of Monrovia (2010) - In a case handled by Scott Tiedemann and Judith Islas, the Court of Appeal, second judicial district, affirmed summary judgment in this alleged retaliation and harassment case brought by a Caucasian police officer based on alleged discriminatory treatment towards his African-American co-worker.  Specifically, the officer claimed he was retaliated against for reporting alleged discriminatory treatment of his African-American co-worker and for testifying on the co-worker's behalf in a separate lawsuit brought by the co-worker.  The officer also alleged the City failed to investigate the alleged harassment and retaliation. In a lengthy opinion, the Court decisively rejected all of the officer's arguments.  Key in the court's analysis was the long and well documented history of the officer's performance issues.  On the harassment and hostile environment claims, the Court concluded that a Caucasian officer can premise these causes of action based on an association with or advocacy on behalf of another officer's protected classification but must show he was personally subjected to unwanted racial comments as a result of the association or advocacy and also, that the conduct was severe and pervasive, which the officer failed to so in this case.
  • Lopez v. Imperial County Sheriff's Office (2008) - Two correctional officers appealed a Personnel Board ruling upholding their terminations based upon a tie vote by the Board. The correctional officers argued that their terminations should be overturned on a tie vote. The Appellate Court rejected that position affirming the trial court's ruling that the terminations were not to be overturned but the officers were to receive a new hearing.
  • Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007) - The Court held that removing a deputy from a special assignment as a pilot "without a concomitant loss of pay" is not a punitive action entitling the officer to a POBR administrative appeal.

Litigation

  • Silberman v. Greater Los Angeles County Vector Control District (2009) - In an age and religious discrimination case, judgment was entered in favor of the employer disposing of all of Plaintiff's claims resulting from a prior reorganization leading to layoffs.
  • Justin Tackett v. County of Imperial (2007) - Summary judgment was awarded in this lawsuit brought by a Sheriff Deputy claiming retaliation and race discrimination.
  • Ho v. City of Azusa (2007) - Obtained a summary judgment on behalf of the city in this case brought by the union president alleging first amendment retaliation.
  • Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2005) - The California Court of Appeal held that removing a deputy sheriff from his special assignment as a pilot "without a concomitant loss of rank or pay" is not a punitive action which entitles the deputy sheriff to an administrative appeal under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act.

Publications

Presentations

Education

  • JD, Loyola Marymount University School of Law
  • BA, Loyola Marymount University
To Contact Liebert Cassidy Whitmore:
Los Angeles 310.981.2000 | Fresno 559.256.7800 | San Francisco 415.512.3000 | info@lcwlegal.com
© 2012 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore